Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:07:52 -0800 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com ([204.94.214.10]:55560 "EHLO deliverator.sgi.com") by oss.sgi.com with ESMTP id ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 15:07:44 -0800 Received: from zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com [128.162.8.103]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA10900 for ; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:59:53 -0800 (PST) mail_from (lord@jen.americas.sgi.com) Received: from thistle-e185.americas.sgi.com (thistle-e185.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.204]) by zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id RAA7585201; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:05:10 -0600 (CST) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (jen.americas.sgi.com [128.162.184.86]) by thistle-e185.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.7) with ESMTP id RAA02780; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:05:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (lord@localhost) by jen.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA32007; Tue, 7 Nov 2000 17:00:30 -0600 Message-Id: <200011072300.RAA32007@jen.americas.sgi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Thomas Graichen , thomas.graichen@innominate.de cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS on ppc status In-Reply-To: Message from Thomas Graichen of "07 Nov 2000 16:02:10 GMT." Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2000 17:00:30 -0600 From: Steve Lord Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing Cool, thanks for the update. Steve > just as a short note: back in berlin at the weekend i found some time > to have a look at XFS on the ppc again and here is the result: > > * the current cvs tree no longer needs any significant changes to build > * there were only two small things: CLOCKS_PER_SEC is not defined in > asm/param.h for the ppc - this one is not related to XFS at all > looks more like a test10 problem (occures only while compiling > fs/binfmt_elf.c) and is easily fixed by defining it there > * cmd/xfs/dump/dump/content.c cries about O_DIRECT not being defined > but as far as i can see it is defined the same way as on i386 in > the includes (asm/fcntl.h) - but maybe an indirect include > does not get this one (anyone having an idea?) - just > commenting out the affected 3 lines gets it going > so far (they are only relevant for realtime > volumes which are as far as i remember not > supported at all so far anyway) > > the resulting system run just fine so far - tested it with the rootfs > XFS and ran two dbench (one 4 and one 8) parallel for some hours and > half of a day an dbench 4 parallel to an endless kernel clean build > - both times no problem so far ... will try to start some of the > stress testing in the next days (have to get more disk space > first) ... so far the satus ... my plans are to setup an > alpha and a ppc here at work now for doing more and > better stress testing - hope to get this done > within the next two weeks > > t > > -- > thomas.graichen@innominate.com > technical director innominate AG > clustering & security the linux architects > tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com