Received: by oss.sgi.com id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:06:21 -0800 Received: from hermes.mixx.net ([212.84.196.2]:6930 "HELO hermes.mixx.net") by oss.sgi.com with SMTP id ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 07:06:13 -0800 Received: from mate.bln.innominate.de (cerberus.berlin.innominate.de [212.84.234.251]) by hermes.mixx.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306F8F80B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 16:06:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by mate.bln.innominate.de (Postfix, from userid 9) id EB1962CA71; Fri, 2 Mar 2001 16:06:09 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Graichen Reply-To: Thomas Graichen X-Newsgroups: innominate.list.sgi.xfs Subject: Re: kio on non-x86 Date: 2 Mar 2001 15:06:09 GMT Organization: innominate AG, Berlin, Germany Lines: 54 Distribution: local Message-ID: References: <200103021430.f22EUL929467@jen.americas.sgi.com> X-Trace: mate.bln.innominate.de 983545569 13548 10.0.0.31 (2 Mar 2001 15:06:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@innominate.de User-Agent: tin/1.4.4-20000803 ("Vet for the Insane") (UNIX) (Linux/2.4.2-XFS (i686)) To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-xfs-outgoing Steve Lord wrote: >> just updated the kernel on my ppc machine yesterday - worked all fine >> so far ... that i tried the kio and kiocluster options on the ppc too >> and ran into problems: as soon as i write to the fs it detects an io >> error and shuts down ... thus a few questions: > I presume the same devices worked OK without kio, did they work OK after > this shutdown? just did very short testings (will do more this evening) but i was able to umount/mount them afterwards and xfs_repair was close to happy with them - but more details later without kio XFS on ppc seems to be as stable as on i386 due to my testings (i am runing fine XFS root - never had any problems so far) >> * am i right in assuming that the kio stuff does not contain any >> arch specific parts so it should - in principle - work also on >> the pcc which would leave endian or gcc issues as a possible >> reason for the problem? > I think this is true, there are no os specific components, where you using > ide or scsi? The ide kio code is specific to having dma turned on. So which > combination was this? it's ide and dma turned on >> * what is the state of XFS on sparc (also big endian)? - if it >> works there: do the kio and kiocluster options work on sparc? > I would have to leave this to the list to answer - and by the way, there > is no difference between these two options now, kiocluster will be going > away I suspect. yes i was remembering this somehow from the list - ok - it's the same behaviour for both anyway :-) >> * does anyone have an idea off-mind what might be the reson for >> this? ... i'll turn on all the debugging options and see if i >> get any more information out of it this evening i think > Chait may have some suggestions, but the specific hardware combination is > the most interesting part of the equation right now. thanks - as said i waill (and can) do more testing this evening t -- thomas.graichen@innominate.com innominate AG the linux architects tel: +49-30-308806-13 fax: -77 http://www.innominate.com