Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3INkT828937 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:46:29 -0700 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3INkSM28934 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:46:28 -0700 Received: from ledzep.americas.sgi.com (relay.sgi.com [137.38.226.97] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA03322 for ; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:46:27 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cattelan@thebarn.com) Received: from gibble.americas.sgi.com (gibble.americas.sgi.com [128.162.195.80]) by ledzep.americas.sgi.com (SGI-SGI-8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id SAA96181; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:45:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from thebarn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gibble.americas.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f3INiBZ14783; Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:44:11 -0400 Message-ID: <3ADE26CB.6F1766ED@thebarn.com> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:44:11 -0400 From: Russell Cattelan X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-XFS i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juha Saarinen CC: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" Subject: Re: XFS in RHL 7.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Juha Saarinen wrote: > On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Russell Cattelan wrote: > > > Hmm why is a big problem? > > Because people will use gcc 2.96 instead of kgcc? ;-) Not unless they specifically change the Makefile back to gcc. Our installer has add compat-egcs when the kernel development option is selected so recompiling the kernel with kgcc shouldn't be any more or less painful. As Steve already stated; given the number of strange problems that has occurred in past by switching compilers, we don't feel comfortable making 2.96 the default until more testing can be done. I suggested to Steve we may want to add his patch with a compiler switch around it, or we may risk it... toss it in... since it doesn't appear to not work with kgcc. Due to some not technical delays with the 1.0 release it looks like we will have time to consider our options. > > > > > > RH also shipping compat-egcs aka kgcc. > > Which is what we are currently building with. > > > > Steve has a kernel running using RH 2.96 compiler, (with a few code tweaks) > > So this will be fixed in the future, but we have to be careful to work with > > other versions of the compiler as many people will not be using RH's version > > of gcc to compile. > > Yep, saw Steve's message. I haven't had very many problems with 2.96 > myself (compiled X, KDE 2.1.1, the kernel and modules, glibc) and the > system is stable. Have heard of a few mishaps though, so... > > -- > Regards, > > Juha > > PGP fingerprint: > B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 -- Russell Cattelan -- Digital Elves inc. -- Currently on loan to SGI Linux XFS core developer.