Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3NBAlV19385 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 04:10:47 -0700 Received: from tux.mkp.net (tux.mkp.net [130.225.60.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f3NBAjM19382 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 04:10:45 -0700 Received: from tux.mkp.net ([130.225.60.11] helo=jaguar.mkp.net) by tux.mkp.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 14reEt-0001Cq-00; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:10:43 +0200 Received: (from mkp@localhost) by jaguar.mkp.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA02156; Mon, 23 Apr 2001 07:09:16 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: jaguar.mkp.net: mkp set sender to mkp@mkp.net using -f To: Ric Tibbetts Cc: Linux XFS List , tgr@spoiled.org Subject: Re: XFS on LVM References: <3AE275FA.4BABF15@chadera.net> <3AE3AFC5.CE9F8386@chadera.net> From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Linuxcare, Inc. Date: 23 Apr 2001 07:09:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3AE3AFC5.CE9F8386@chadera.net> Message-ID: Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.2 (Urania) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk >>>>> "Ric" == Ric Tibbetts writes: Ric> PS: You guys may want to change the documentation that's on your Ric> web site. In the FAQ, it addresses the issue of XFS on LVM, and Ric> recomends applying the LVM patch. Since it obviously causes Ric> breakage (at least for the recent kernel) maybe you should Ric> indicate that. I might save someone else some hassle. The LVM and RAID sections of the FAQ are quite out of sync with our current bits, I'm afraid. Thomas, are you out there? -- Martin K. Petersen, Principal Linux Consultant, Linuxcare, Inc. mkp@linuxcare.com, http://www.linuxcare.com/ SGI XFS for Linux Developer, http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/