Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4BEFCT06317 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 11 May 2001 07:15:12 -0700 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4BEFCF06313 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 07:15:12 -0700 Received: from zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com [128.162.8.103]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id HAA12318 for ; Fri, 11 May 2001 07:13:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (lord@sgi.com) Received: from daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (daisy.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.214]) by zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id JAA1780267; Fri, 11 May 2001 09:13:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (IDENT:root@jen.americas.sgi.com [128.162.184.86]) by daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.7) with ESMTP id JAA13153; Fri, 11 May 2001 09:13:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com by jen.americas.sgi.com (8.11.0/SGI-client-1.7) via ESMTP id f4BEGfP15556; Fri, 11 May 2001 09:16:41 -0500 Message-Id: <200105111416.f4BEGfP15556@jen.americas.sgi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: "a. heidenreich" cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: xfs In-Reply-To: Message from "a. heidenreich" of "Thu, 10 May 2001 23:14:27 +0200." <3AFB04B2.D4F75523@swol.de> Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 09:16:41 -0500 From: Steve Lord Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk > hi, > > it seems to me that using the same external logdevice for two different > xfs filesystems doesn't work! are there any restrictions? (sorry, i > don't find anything in your man pages or online papers) > > thx in advance. > > andre > To add a second response here - the Irix implementation does not truly support external logs, Irix volume managers support volumes which have seperate subvolumes for file data and the log - it looks like a single device to everything but the volume manager and the filesystem. Since Linux volume managers have no similar concept this was mapped to explicitly specifying separate devices on the mkfs and mount command lines. This however is a totally different implementation from ext3's ability to share a log device between filesystems. Getting xfs to use a shared journal device across several filesystem is not a realistic proposition without major code surgery and breaking compatibility with existing filesystems. Steve