Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4IAbuB15111 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 18 May 2001 03:37:56 -0700 Received: from relay1.alcatel.be (alc119.alcatel.be [195.207.101.119]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4IAbsF15106 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 03:37:54 -0700 Received: from bt02e0.god.bel.alcatel.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay1.alcatel.be (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f4IAbfL25577; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:37:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from god.bel.alcatel.be (bt02e1.god.bel.alcatel.be [138.203.145.14]) by bt02e0.god.bel.alcatel.be (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/1.1) with ESMTP id MAA08494; Fri, 18 May 2001 12:37:18 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B04FB3A.27F88ED0@god.bel.alcatel.be> Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:36:42 +0200 From: kris buggenhout X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" CC: dmarkh@cfl.rr.com Subject: Re: trouble benchmarking References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010517130519.038d0c88@pop.xs4all.nl> <3B044CEE.16BEE674@cfl.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Mark Hounschell wrote: > > Seth Mos wrote: > > > > At 11:46 17-5-2001 +0200, kris buggenhout wrote: > > >it looks like a scsi error .. but when I do the same test on the same > > >drive with ext2 i get no error. > > > > ext2 probably handles bad blocks better. The XFS filesystem shuts down on > > error. Ext2 may stay up and note that the sector is moved and the data is ok. > > It might be possible that xfs could be made to respect this re allocation > > of a bad sector and perhaps not shut down. > > The scsi drives "page-1 mode-select" error recovery page should be set > to not > report recovered errors. This can be changed with any decent scsi disc > utility where can I find that for linux? or do I have to install windows to only change that..?