Received: (from mail@localhost)
	by linux-xfs.sgi.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) id f591TaYD007495
	for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:29:36 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: linux-xfs.sgi.com: mail set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f
Received: from mailhost.idcomm.com (mailhost.idcomm.com [207.40.196.14])
	by linux-xfs.sgi.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f591TY3D007480
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:29:35 -0700
Received: from idcomm.com (IDENT:stimits@k56-pip35.idcomm.com [209.60.72.162])
	by mailhost.idcomm.com (8.10.2/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f591cdU04052
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:38:39 -0600
Message-ID: <3B217C2C.A31D6ECC@idcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 19:30:20 -0600
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@idcomm.com>
Reply-To: stimits@idcomm.com
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre1-xfs-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: xfstests
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

How important is it to run the cmd/xfstests? The extra partition
requirement can be a pain to come up with, but if the xfstests are more
or less just there for good feelings now, I might consider ignoring it.
What do I gain or lose by running or not running the xfstests?

D. Stimits, stimits@idcomm.com