Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f5NGTWu31717 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:29:32 -0700 Received: from msg.ecetra.com (dollar.ecetra.com [193.164.224.209]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f5NGTVV31714 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:29:31 -0700 Received: from vie-ac.office.ecetra.com (vie-ac.office.ecetra.com [10.251.148.147] (may be forged)) by msg.ecetra.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA29015; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:29:24 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vie-ac.office.ecetra.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5NGTOU28381; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:29:24 +0200 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:29:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Adam Cioccarelli To: Juha Saarinen cc: "linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com" Subject: Re: xfs-progs and gcc-3.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Hi Juha, I tried it about 5 times and everything is fine... or at least I can't find anything yet. Adam On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Juha Saarinen wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Adam Cioccarelli wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm not sure if anyone is interested as I am sure there are bigger fish to > > fry at the moment, but the compilation of the xfs-progs fails when I try > > and use gcc-3.0 to compile them. > > > > By the way the kernel compiles and runs (24 hours uptime as I write...) > > Adam, > > Could you try a simple test that my machine has problems with...? Go into > single mode from multiuser mode, and then back again, a few times? I > usually end up with bits of /var getting corrupted (lock files, PID files > e.g.) if I do it on a system that's been compiled with anything newer than > 2.91. > > -- > Regards, > > > Juha > > PGP fingerprint: > B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502 10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544 >