Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f6KHa7616185 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:36:07 -0700 Received: from stine.vestdata.no (IDENT:0@stine.vestdata.no [195.204.68.10]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6KHa4V16166 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:36:05 -0700 Received: (from ragnark@localhost) by stine.vestdata.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA19442; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:35:43 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:35:42 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ragnar_Kj=F8rstad?= To: Steve Lord Cc: Federico Sevilla III , Linux XFS Mailing List Subject: Re: Anyone using XFS ACLs? Message-ID: <20010720193542.D19116@vestdata.no> References: <200107201332.f6KDWaD01276@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: <200107201332.f6KDWaD01276@jen.americas.sgi.com>; from Steve Lord on Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:32:36AM -0500 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 08:32:36AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > > NFS does not support ACLs. > > No it does not, but XFS running under nfs will still impose the acls on > accesses from NFS. Actually there is a SUN-extention for NFSv3 to support NFS, and NFSv4 support ACLs natively. I don't think the SUN-extention has been ported to linux, but NFSv4 is on it's way. I don't know what state it is in though. -- Ragnar Kjorstad Big Storage