Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f7VMQit32049 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:26:44 -0700 Received: from st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de (IDENT:qmailr@voyager.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.24.132]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7VMQcd32023 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:26:39 -0700 Received: (qmail 12066 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2001 22:26:37 -0000 Received: from svetljo.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de (HELO st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de) (172.17.17.181) by voyager.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 22:26:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3B900F46.9040402@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 00:27:18 +0200 From: svetljo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010802 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] PBs with LVM over software RAID References: <3B8E3F0E.8050609@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20010830083546.A20989@sistina.com> <3B8EC633.40202@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <3B8F8C5E.7030603@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20010831110512.V541@turbolinux.com> <3B8FD95C.60702@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> <20010831130718.C541@turbolinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk hi it works with IMB's JFS when i try mkfs -t reiserfs -f /dev/myData/SRC it segfaults : [root@svetljo mnt]# mkfs -t reiserfs -f /dev/myData/SRC mkreiserfs, 2001 - reiserfsprogs 3.x.0j =================================================================== LEAF NODE (8211) contains level=1, nr_items=2, free_space=3932 rdkey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |###|type|ilen|f/sp| loc|fmt|fsck| key | | | | |e/cn| | |need| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Segmentation fault isn't that a bit strange that reiserfs and xfs doesn't handle it, but jfs does and the one with ext2 : [root@svetljo mnt]# mkfs -t ext2 /dev/myData/SRC mke2fs 1.22, 22-Jun-2001 for EXT2 FS 0.5b, 95/08/09 Filesystem label= OS type: Linux Block size=4096 (log=2) Fragment size=4096 (log=2) 786432 inodes, 1572864 blocks 78643 blocks (5.00%) reserved for the super user First data block=0 48 block groups 32768 blocks per group, 32768 fragments per group 16384 inodes per group Superblock backups stored on blocks: 32768, 98304, 163840, 229376, 294912, 819200, 884736 Writing inode tables: Segmentation fault i realy don't like that Andreas Dilger wrote: >On Aug 31, 2001 20:37 +0200, svetljo wrote: > >>>>EIP; e29c0266 <[linear]linear_make_request+36/f0> <===== >>>> >>Trace; c023fa12 <__make_request+412/6d0> >>Trace; c0278dcd >>Trace; c027fa0f >>Trace; c023fd89 >> > >OK, so the oops is inside the RAID layer, but it may be that it is >being fed bogus data from a higher layer. Even so, it should not >oops in this case. Since XFS changes a lot of the kernel code, I >would either suggest asking the XFS folks to look at this oops, >or maybe on the MD RAID mailing list, as they will know more about it. > >Cheers, Andreas >