Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9CJZPS29008 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:35:25 -0700 Received: from afara-gw.afara.com (mx1.afara.com [63.113.218.20]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9CJZJD28960 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:35:20 -0700 Received: from tduffy-lnx.afara.com ([10.2.4.191]) by afara-gw.afara.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:34:37 -0700 Subject: Re: XFS on RAID 10 From: Thomas Duffy To: Seth Mos Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com X-Sender: knuffie@pop.xs4all.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 In-Reply-To: <1002857059.5390.11.camel@tduffy-lnx.afara.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Oct 2001 05:35:03.0192 (UTC) FILETIME=[A45E6980:01C152DF] In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20011012073050.03147d38@pop.xs4all.nl> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20011012073050.03147d38@pop.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.15.99+cvs.2001.10.09.08.08 (Preview Release) Date: 12 Oct 2001 12:34:55 -0700 Message-Id: <1002915296.7002.2.camel@tduffy-lnx.afara.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2001-10-11 at 22:34, Seth Mos wrote: > At 20:24 11-10-2001 -0700, Thomas Duffy wrote: > >I have setup a little (280G) xfs on RAID 10 (RAID 1 on RAID 0). This > >has 8 SCSI drives (4 per card). > > Hardware, software or something in the middle? all software > >Everything seems to work fine, expect the RAID resync craaaawwwllllsss. > >It goes at the minimum of 100k/s which should take a few months to > >finish syncing :) It sometimes bumps up to 250 k/s, but never higher > >even with no system activity. > > There is something about resyncing in the manpages of the raid tools IIRC. > What kernel are you using, any special options and compiled with what compiler. > IIRC there were some IO stalls fixed somewhere around 2.4.6. 2.4.11 now...will move up to 2.4.13-pre1 shortly...compiled with redhat's 2.96-85 (i think I have the minor right here)...I know this is not the "supported" compiler, but it seems to work fine. > >First off, does anyone know of a way to bump the sync rate up? Could > >this be some sorta weirdness between XFS and MD that is causing the slow > >resync? On a simple RAID 1 setup (2 disks) w/ XFS on the device, the > >resync is as speedy as the SCSI card allows when there is no other I/O > >which is what I would expect from MD. > > What version of md are you using and what scsi card is it. they are adaptec scsi cards. not sure what version of md...whatever is in the 2.4.11 kernel. -tduffy