Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9DEU4S14022 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:30:04 -0700 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9DETxD13988 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:29:59 -0700 Received: from zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com [128.162.8.103]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA04957 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:29:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (lord@sgi.com) Received: from daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (daisy.americas.sgi.com [128.162.185.214]) by zeus-fddi.americas.sgi.com (8.9.3/americas-smart-nospam1.1) with ESMTP id JAA3087046; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:28:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com (jen.americas.sgi.com [128.162.187.49]) by daisy-e185.americas.sgi.com (SGI-8.9.3/SGI-server-1.7) with ESMTP id JAA39794; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:28:41 -0500 (CDT) Received: from jen.americas.sgi.com by jen.americas.sgi.com (8.11.6/SGI-client-1.7) via ESMTP id f9DEQsx01980; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:26:54 -0500 Message-Id: <200110131426.f9DEQsx01980@jen.americas.sgi.com> To: Robert Sander cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 References: <3BC7950E.8030807@brocade.com> <200110131403.f9DE3QJ01897@jen.americas.sgi.com> Comments: In-reply-to Robert Sander message dated "Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:12:27 -0000." Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 09:26:54 -0500 From: Steve Lord Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk > On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:08:02 +0000 (UTC), > Steve Lord wrote: > > In general I would recommend trying a newer kernel in situations like > > this. There are plenty of bugfixes in both the mainline kernel and > > the xfs code itself - we do not have the resources to backport the > > fixes to an earlier kernel and repackage it. > > I know, I tried 2.4.12 but the aacraid patch for the Dell RAID > controller didn't work. :-( So I had to stick with 2.4.5, and > XFS 1.0.1 and 2.4.5 is the official XFS release by SGI, so it should > work, shouldn't it? Well, the only things we touch in the kernel are XFS and some small changes to the mainline kernel to make the interfaces we need available to user space and some extensions in the buffer cache and vm for delayed allocation writes. Anything below the block layer, or in any device driver is purely off the shelf (from Linus's tree or from Redhat depending on the pachage). The point of us packaging a release was to make XFS available in an easier to swallow form, not to provide a complete linux distribution. The 2.4.3 kernel rpm in 1.0.1 is a modification of the redhat 7.1 kernel, the 2.4.5 kernel is a vanilla linux kernel. We are working on getting things going in the redhat 7.2 kernel (due out real soon now). This may offer a new package, I am not sure if we will be packaging things as we have done in the past yet though. The new mandrake (8.1) release also includes xfs, I cannot speak for their driver support as I have not looked and tend not to use much beyond the basics myself. Hopefully other people on the list can suggest other kernel versions which will work with your hardware. Steve > Greetings > -- > Robert Sander > Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG > Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 > +493024345330 10435 Berlin