Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9DF1ol14636 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:01:50 -0700 Received: from gk.hm.epigenomics.net (qmailr@gk.hm.epigenomics.net [212.121.137.90]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9DF1lD14613 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 08:01:47 -0700 Received: (qmail 19727 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2001 15:01:48 -0000 Received: from raman.epigenomics.epi (qmailr@192.168.2.2) by salam.epigenomics.epi with SMTP; 13 Oct 2001 15:01:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 11844 invoked by uid 515); 13 Oct 2001 15:01:45 -0000 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 17:01:45 +0200 From: Robert Sander To: Steve Lord Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 Message-ID: <20011013170145.A9510@epigenomics.com> References: <3BC7950E.8030807@brocade.com> <200110131403.f9DE3QJ01897@jen.americas.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200110131403.f9DE3QJ01897@jen.americas.sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i X-Operating-System: Linux raman 2.4.5-p2550-xfs-ngroups Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 09:03:26AM -0500, Steve Lord wrote: > In general I would recommend trying a newer kernel in situations like > this. There are plenty of bugfixes in both the mainline kernel and > the xfs code itself - we do not have the resources to backport the > fixes to an earlier kernel and repackage it. OK, it doesn't seem to be XFS related, as the problem also occurs on a Samba share with an underlying ext2fs. Crazy, crazy... Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 +493024345330 10435 Berlin