Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9TKHTt05019 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:17:29 -0800 Received: from femail32.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail32.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.254.60.22]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9TKHI004994 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:17:24 -0800 Received: from there ([65.4.56.167]) by femail32.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20011029201708.RRSE26359.femail32.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there>; Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:17:08 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Micah Yoder To: Steve Lord Subject: Re: Upgrading kernel, Compile error in module Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 12:17:19 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com References: <200110291526.f9TFQf132535@jen.americas.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <200110291526.f9TFQf132535@jen.americas.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20011029201708.RRSE26359.femail32.sdc1.sfba.home.com@there> Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Monday 29 October 2001 10:26 am, Steve Lord wrote: > There was a change went into the 2.4.13-pre3 which affects how block device > modules do reference counting to avoid module unload being performed on you mean 2.4.14pre3? If 13, any issues from that should be fixed... (I didn't see it in the changelog for either 2.4.13 or 2.4.14) > In general I would not put a pre-xxx kernel up in production unless you > yourself have done fairly extensive testing. The 2.4.13 kernel itself > seems fairly robust, there is a patch for this on the ftp site: > > ftp://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/patches ok I'll compile that sucker instead. Thanks! Micah -- Like to travel? http://TravTalk.org Micah Yoder Internet Development http://yoderdev.com