Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) id f9DECYP13715 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:12:34 -0700 Received: from gk.hm.epigenomics.net (qmailr@gk.hm.epigenomics.net [212.121.137.90]) by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f9DECUD13693 for ; Sat, 13 Oct 2001 07:12:31 -0700 Received: (qmail 19494 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2001 14:12:31 -0000 Received: from raman.epigenomics.epi (qmailr@192.168.2.2) by salam.epigenomics.epi with SMTP; 13 Oct 2001 14:12:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1321 invoked from network); 13 Oct 2001 14:12:29 -0000 Received: from broglie.epigenomics.epi (qmailr@192.168.1.5) by raman.epigenomics.epi with SMTP; 13 Oct 2001 14:12:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 30615 invoked by uid 9); 13 Oct 2001 14:12:28 -0000 From: Robert Sander Reply-To: Robert Sander X-Newsgroups: epi.ml.linux.xfs Subject: Re: process hang with xfs 1.0.1 Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:12:27 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Epigenomics AG Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <3BC7950E.8030807@brocade.com> <200110131403.f9DE3QJ01897@jen.americas.sgi.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@epigenomics.com User-Agent: slrn/0.9.7.2 (Linux) To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk On Sat, 13 Oct 2001 14:08:02 +0000 (UTC), Steve Lord wrote: > In general I would recommend trying a newer kernel in situations like > this. There are plenty of bugfixes in both the mainline kernel and > the xfs code itself - we do not have the resources to backport the > fixes to an earlier kernel and repackage it. I know, I tried 2.4.12 but the aacraid patch for the Dell RAID controller didn't work. :-( So I had to stick with 2.4.5, and XFS 1.0.1 and 2.4.5 is the official XFS release by SGI, so it should work, shouldn't it? Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics R&D www.epigenomics.com Kastanienallee 24 +493024345330 10435 Berlin