Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5S5HcnC031291
	for <linux-xfs-outgoing@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:17:38 -0700
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5S5HcSp031290
	for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:17:38 -0700
X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f
Received: from mymail.canadawired.com (209-139-208-5.canadawired.com [209.139.208.5])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g5S5HXnC031261
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:17:33 -0700
Received: from alexa.myfakedomain.not (209-139-208-113.canadawired.com [209.139.208.113])
	by mymail.canadawired.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA96850
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from rep@canadawired.com)
Received: by alexa.myfakedomain.not (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7B0704210D3; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:21:31 -0700
From: Ron Peterson <rep@canadawired.com>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.5-cvs and gcc-3.1 oops
Message-ID: <20020628052131.GA1267@alexa>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20
X-Spam-Level: 
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

I tried changing the ffs call in xfs/pagebuf/page_buf_locking.c function
pagebuf_target_blocksize to generic_ffs, and it seems to work. The
result is running now. The two *ffs functions generate identical code
with "gcc -S", so I'm hoping this kernel will be ok. If anyone thinks
there will be a problem with this I'd appreciate hearing about it. 

Thanks, 
Ron