Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5N018nC023563 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:01:08 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5N018ox023562 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:01:08 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.137]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g5N010nC023532 for ; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:01:01 -0700 Received: from auto-nb1.xs4all.nl (qn-212-58-163-7.quicknet.nl [212.58.163.7]) by smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g5N04CfB009267; Sun, 23 Jun 2002 02:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020623020124.0336de30@pop.xs4all.nl> X-Sender: knuffie@pop.xs4all.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2002 02:04:07 +0200 To: , From: Seth Mos Subject: Re: Slight problem with XFS/Linux and Indy Drive In-Reply-To: <000201c21a3b$c74cffa0$6401a8c0@WORKGROUP> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk At 17:25 22-6-2002 -0500, Zach Lowry wrote: > But, after checking out the archives, it seems that I'm falling >victim to the page size restriction. Now, here are my questions: The XFS CVS has support for the smaller then pagesize volumes so I think there is a chance it will work. The -current CVS is based on 2.4.19-pre which should have everything you need for this. Asuming that the fs was formatted with a block size of <4K that is. Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.