Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5R70QnC003068 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:26 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5R70QS8003067 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:26 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.139]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g5R70GnC003039 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:16 -0700 Received: from auto-nb1.xs4all.nl (213-84-127-28.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.127.28]) by smtpzilla3.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id g5R73hn4062594; Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020627085551.03c50ce8@pop.xs4all.nl> X-Sender: knuffie@pop.xs4all.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:03:29 +0200 To: Benito Venegas , From: Seth Mos Subject: Re: kswapd Oops with 2.4.9-31SGI_XFS_1.1smp Cc: Marek Kubita In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk At 22:32 26-6-2002 -0400, Benito Venegas wrote: >Hi Boys (any girl here :P) > >System was running ok until today. I had to reboot server manually. >This is the first one Oops since a long time ago (last was on xfs 1.0.2) >This server is not using NFS server. >We use some perl script, java tools for internal worflow system. checking/repairing your filesystem might be a good idea. Even when it's not damaged it would not hurt to check. >I will check if I need update firmware. There have been both raid and bios updates in the past. I know of at least one PERC2 update that fixes corruption during poweroff with write back cache enabled. (even with the battery pack). Do you get this oops at every boot of the machine or very frequent? Checking your system after an Oops is always a good idea in my opinion. Journaling filesystems can recover from a poweroff and have filesystem integrity. But they can NOT protect you from data corruption when your kernel oopses. If something is clobbering some important part of memory that just got written to you have a serious problem. Cheers -- Seth It might just be your lucky day, if you only knew.