Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g5PLXWnC007787 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:33:32 -0700 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g5PLXWNq007784 for linux-xfs-outgoing; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:33:32 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: oss.sgi.com: majordomo set sender to owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com using -f Received: from dns.securities.com (mail01.securities.com [57.69.15.71]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id g5PLXNnC007755 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 14:33:24 -0700 Received: from localhost (venevene@localhost) by dns.securities.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g5PLaj927641; Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:36:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 17:36:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Benito Venegas To: Harrison Xing cc: Seth Mos , Subject: Re: Open file corruption? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.20 X-Spam-Level: Sender: owner-linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk I experience some problems after some reboots in my 2550 and 2450. After to apply 2.4.9-31 with xfs version 1.1, I haven't experienced same problem (I did some test open some files with vi and other internal web tools and I reboot the servers) My $0.02 of experience. On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Harrison Xing wrote: > > Thanks for your suggestion. > My concern is that whether my current XFS 1.0.1 release may > lose data for files opened as read-only. Someone has seen once or twice that > "fstab" is corrupted after power off. I know XFS 1.1 has made > lots of enhancements, is it ever possible this also happens > with XFS 1.1? > > Can anyone give a clear answer on this for both 1.0.1 and 1.1? Thanks. > > -- Benito A. Venegas System Engineer, Technology 225 Park Ave. South (6th floor ISI) New York, NY 10003 A Euromoney Institutional Investor company.