Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 08 Jan 2003 14:13:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from poptart.bithose.com (ip-204-97-176-41.modem.logical.net [204.97.176.41]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h08MCw3v020776 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 14:12:59 -0800 Received: from poptart.bithose.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by poptart.bithose.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h08MIeN1053399 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:18:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (jakari@localhost) by poptart.bithose.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) with ESMTP id h08MIedS053396 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:18:40 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: poptart.bithose.com: jakari owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 17:18:40 -0500 (EST) From: Jameel Akari To: linux-xfs Subject: SSI Clusters & XFS? In-Reply-To: <20021228140705.GA17731@bonzo.nirvana> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-archive-position: 2252 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jakari@bithose.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Has anyone used the Single Systems Image (SSI) for Linux code with XFS in the same kernel? http://ssic-linux.sourceforge.net/install.shtml These assume a 2.4.18 kernel.. I don't see why you couldn't apply the XFS patches to it as well (or apply the SSI patches to a XFS CVS checkout). Seems to me that using XFS for the shared cluster filesystem would be a Good Thing.. The Sourceforge mailing list search doesn't seem to return anything about XFS.. then again it is running suspiciously slow, so I don't know. The SGI Altix 3000 announcement made me think more about clustering... mainly because I can't afford anything like an Altix with a "proper" single image. ;) #!/jameel/akari sleep 4800; make clean && make breakfast