Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.unc.edu (smtpsrv12.isis.unc.edu [152.2.1.243]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h1IJoe3v012934 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:50:41 -0800 Received: from jennyw.unc.edu (dhcp8358.dhcp.unc.edu [152.2.213.230]) by smtp.unc.edu (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h1IJwYAh012751; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:58:34 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:58:36 -0500 From: Jenny Williams To: Eric Sandeen cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Corrupted file on iso installer image of XFS 1.2 Message-ID: <16578208.1045580316@jennyw> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.0.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-archive-position: 2761 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jenny_williams@unc.edu Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 880 Lines: 30 Thank you for the information. I'll keep my eyes peeled. --On Tuesday, February 18, 2003 1:43 PM -0600 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Oh, we'll probably get it worked out. I swore last time that I would > not do another RH installer, but Russell was nice enough to step > in and do it this time. :) It's just a matter of priorities and > time. > > But there's no point in leaving a non-functional installer out there, > so it'll probably get fixed up. > > -Eric > > > On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Jenny Williams wrote: > >> >> Might that re-spin be undertaken, or are you guys going to let it be the >> way it is? I figure that if the functionality changed from one iso >> image to the next it might be an issue for people. Please know I ask >> this with the full understanding that you guys spin these RedHat >> specific files above and beyond the call. > Jenny