Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:14:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from K-7.stesmi.com (as4-1-7.has.s.bonet.se [217.215.31.238]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id h1HKEB3v025828 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:14:13 -0800 Received: from stesmi.com (as4-1-7.has.s.bonet.se [217.215.31.238]) by K-7.stesmi.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1HKMoVb003316 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:51 +0100 Message-ID: <3E51449A.5000502@stesmi.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:22:50 +0100 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20021003 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: A few questions regarding XFS 1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.4.2(snapshot 20021217) (K-7.stesmi.com) X-archive-position: 2727 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: stesmi@stesmi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 409 Lines: 12 Can someone please inform me about something.. The installer ISO contains acl-2.0.19, acl-devel-2.0.19 and libacl-2.0.19 whereas the RPMS directory on the ftp site contains acl-2.0.19, libacl-2.0.19 and libacl-devel-2.0.19. Why? Also, The attr package version is 2.0.11-0 in the installer image but 2.0.12-0 on the ftp site. Again, why? Same name issue exists (attr-devel vs libattr-devel). // Stefan