Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ams006.ftl.affinity.com (lvs00-fl-n06.valueweb.net [216.219.253.152]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id h8MICTFx030549 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:12:30 -0700 Received: from david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com ([66.156.0.127]) by ams.ftl.affinity.com with ESMTP id <4404068-18621>; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:11:18 -0400 Subject: Re: Read performance issues with 2.6.0test5? From: Greg Freemyer Reply-To: freemyer-ml@NorcrossGroup.com To: Austin Gonyou Cc: Frank Hellmann , XFS List In-Reply-To: <1064248640.1949.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <3F6EFF6E.9040005@opticalart.de> <1064248640.1949.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1064253817.1744.1.camel@david.internal.NorcrossGroup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.3 Date: 22 Sep 2003 14:03:38 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 480 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: freemyer-ml@NorcrossGroup.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 480 Lines: 17 On Mon, 2003-09-22 at 12:37, Austin Gonyou wrote: > I agree that these results are odd. Something is amiss here, but there > really are many parts to remove before signifying one or the other. You > could always format that MD volume you made as EXT3 or Reiser and > perform the same test. > If the filesystem is of no value, you could also do you dd to the raw MD volume. If that has similar problems then you can forget about xfs as the bottleneck. Greg -- Greg Freemyer