Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:13:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBHBDATa006054
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:13:10 -0800
Received: (from xfs@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id hBHBDAPw006048
	for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:13:10 -0800
Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hBHBD5Ts005954
	for <xfs-master@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 17 Dec 2003 03:13:08 -0800
Received: (from apache@localhost)
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id hBHAvhQY005705;
	Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:57:43 -0800
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 02:57:43 -0800
Message-Id: <200312171057.hBHAvhQY005705@oss.sgi.com>
From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com
To: xfs-master@oss.sgi.com
Subject: [Bug 288] XFS NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000005c
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-archive-position: 1454
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-xfs
Content-Length: 445
Lines: 16

http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=288





------- Additional Comments From hch@xfs.org  2003-17-12 02:57 PDT -------
XFS currently assumes the buf_get/buf_read may not return NULL because they don't
on IRIX.  On Linux on the other hand they may return NULL when kmem_cache_alloc
fails.  I'm working on a fix now.



------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.