Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0D6GB6H003694 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:16:11 -0800 Received: (from xfs@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i0D6GBG9003693 for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:16:11 -0800 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0D6G96J003679 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:16:10 -0800 Received: (from apache@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i0D6BXwd003551; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:11:33 -0800 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:11:33 -0800 Message-Id: <200401130611.i0D6BXwd003551@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-master@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 299] compiling xfsprogs-2.6.0 fails X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-archive-position: 1716 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 793 Lines: 30 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=299 ------- Additional Comments From nathans@sgi.com 2004-12-01 22:11 PDT ------- Sorry, my last mailw as a bit misleading - where I said there will be a failing test program near: configure:3461: checking uuid/uuid.h usability I meant near: configure:XXXX: checking uuid/uuid.h presence "presence" being the key difference there. Just below that line, there should be the text of a C program and some compiler error messages - like there is for the uuid.h test you've sent there. It'll be in the config.log file, not a separate file. In fact, just sending me your entire config.log file might be simpler. thanks. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.