Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 20 May 2004 08:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from K-7.stesmi.com (1-2-2-1a.has.sth.bostream.se [82.182.130.86]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i4KFxdKO028881 for ; Thu, 20 May 2004 08:59:40 -0700 Received: from stesmi.com (deltaflyer.stesmi.com [192.168.1.14]) by K-7.stesmi.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i4KFxIId005306; Thu, 20 May 2004 17:59:18 +0200 Message-ID: <40ACD5AB.2070405@stesmi.com> Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 17:58:35 +0200 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040316 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Net Llama!" CC: Eric Sandeen , How Wong , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: FC2 XFS install from harddisk References: <40AC68BD.2080704@netscape.net> <1085067505.4181.1.camel@stout.americas.sgi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-archive-position: 3167 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: stesmi@stesmi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 250 Lines: 10 Net Llama! wrote: > What is it in the 'expert' install that you needed? Admittedly, my > testing was the basic 'linux xfs' install of FC2-test1. I submitted a bug > that i found related to XFS, and they fixed it. Which bug was that ? // Stefan