Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web51803.mail.yahoo.com (web51803.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.234]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i5EHpKgi018110 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 10:51:20 -0700 Message-ID: <20040614165634.5217.qmail@web51803.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [158.140.2.102] by web51803.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:56:34 PDT Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 09:56:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Phy Prabab Subject: Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs To: Kazuyuki Goto , genanr@emsphone.com Cc: nathans@sgi.com, tsuda@tnes.nec.co.jp, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, kazuyuki@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp, ctierney@HPTI.com In-Reply-To: <200406142337.GGH60721.ZLJVVLYB@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 3385 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: phyprabab@yahoo.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 1893 Lines: 73 I have similar problems on some XFS exported volumes. I tried to follow this thread backwards, but failed to find the posted patch. Is this patch part of a formal set or where can this be acquired? Thanks! Phy --- Kazuyuki Goto wrote: > We have no such corruption with the patch for more > than four days. We all thank you > very much, Tsuda-san and everyone involved. > > About the following problem, it was another problem, > and has no relation with xfs. > Sorry for confusing you. > > 2) Width is a 964 bytes, ending up to 4kB > boundary. > > *I'm not sure the cause is same as 1) above. > > Kazuyuki > > > In message <20040611185804.GA26804@thumper2> > From "Andy " on Fri, 11 > Jun 2004 13:58:04 -0500 > To Craig Tierney > Cc Nathan Scott , Masanori TSUDA > ,linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, > Kazuyuki Goto > Subject "Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs" > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:27:05AM -0600, Craig > Tierney wrote: > > > > > I'm sure Russell will have more to add tomorrow > when he's > > > awake. I've ported your patch forward to > current CVS (for > > > 2.4 and 2.6 kernels), for my own testing > purposes and have > > > included it below for anyone else who is > interested. > > > > > > > I ported the patch last night to the 2.4.26 kernel > when I saw > > Tsuda's post. This patch seems to have solved my > problem. > > I will continue to test. > > > So far, so good. I have not seen any more > corruption since I applied the > patch. I thank everybody involved, especially > Masanori for identifying the > problem and providing a working solution. > > Andy > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/