Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:39:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns6.sony.co.jp (NS6.Sony.CO.JP [137.153.0.32]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i5EEdDgi008608 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 07:39:14 -0700 Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp ([43.0.1.202]) Received: from mail2.sony.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id i5EEdB609902; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:39:11 +0900 (JST) Received: from cpgsgw.sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp ([43.4.148.1]) by mail2.sony.co.jp (R8/Sony) with ESMTP id i5EEdAt09882; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:39:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from dse10.sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp (dse10 [43.4.149.10]) by cpgsgw.sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp (8.8.8+Sun/3.6W/980617(siva)) with ESMTP id XAA10508; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:39:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from DSE77 by dse10.sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp (8.8.8/6.4J.6) id XAA28183; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:39:09 +0900 (JST) To: genanr@emsphone.com Cc: nathans@sgi.com, tsuda@tnes.nec.co.jp, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, kazuyuki@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp, ctierney@HPTI.com Subject: Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs From: Kazuyuki Goto References: <200405271558.EJG73779.VJBLYZVL@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp> <200406100130.AA00198@tnesb9665.tnes.nec.co.jp> <20040610084803.GA620@frodo> <1086874025.2861.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20040611185804.GA26804@thumper2> In-Reply-To: <20040611185804.GA26804@thumper2> Message-Id: <200406142337.GGH60721.ZLJVVLYB@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp> X-Mailer: Winbiff [Version 2.43 PL1] X-Accept-Language: ja,en Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:37:03 +0900 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-archive-position: 3382 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: kazuyuki@sys1.cpg.sony.co.jp Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 1378 Lines: 37 We have no such corruption with the patch for more than four days. We all thank you very much, Tsuda-san and everyone involved. About the following problem, it was another problem, and has no relation with xfs. Sorry for confusing you. > 2) Width is a 964 bytes, ending up to 4kB boundary. > *I'm not sure the cause is same as 1) above. Kazuyuki In message <20040611185804.GA26804@thumper2> From "Andy " on Fri, 11 Jun 2004 13:58:04 -0500 To Craig Tierney Cc Nathan Scott , Masanori TSUDA ,linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, Kazuyuki Goto Subject "Re: data corruption on nfs+xfs" On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 07:27:05AM -0600, Craig Tierney wrote: > > > I'm sure Russell will have more to add tomorrow when he's > > awake. I've ported your patch forward to current CVS (for > > 2.4 and 2.6 kernels), for my own testing purposes and have > > included it below for anyone else who is interested. > > > > I ported the patch last night to the 2.4.26 kernel when I saw > Tsuda's post. This patch seems to have solved my problem. > I will continue to test. > So far, so good. I have not seen any more corruption since I applied the patch. I thank everybody involved, especially Masanori for identifying the problem and providing a working solution. Andy