Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lists.vasoftware.com (mail@internalmx2.vasoftware.com [12.152.184.150])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i6VIVKRS024200
	for <linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:31:21 -0700
Received: from adsl-67-122-115-220.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net ([67.122.115.220]:64659 helo=[10.0.0.1])
	by lists.vasoftware.com with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.20 #1 (Debian))
	id 1BqydY-0003OL-03 by VAauthid <lfriedman> with fixed_plain; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:31:16 -0700
Message-ID: <410BE571.1040603@linux-sxs.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:31:13 -0700
From: "Net Llama!" <netllama@linux-sxs.org>
Organization: HAL V
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8a2) Gecko/20040716
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
CC: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Recover a XFS on raid -1 (linear) when one disk is broken
References: <40F6DBC1.6050909@grabbarna.nu> <20040715205910.GA9948@taniwha.stupidest.org> <40F9321C.7060403@grabbarna.nu> <20040717203943.GL20260@plato.local.lan> <410ADC0A.6060100@grabbarna.nu> <20040731054924.GA4748@taniwha.stupidest.org> <410B4BC3.8000404@grabbarna.nu> <20040731091220.GA6158@taniwha.stupidest.org> <410BCFA7.6090709@linux-sxs.org> <20040731182849.GC11283@taniwha.stupidest.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040731182849.GC11283@taniwha.stupidest.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-EA-Verified: lists.vasoftware.com 1BqydY-0003OL-03 c59a74ab71e490b918e7607688ff9c06
X-archive-position: 3802
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
X-original-sender: netllama@linux-sxs.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-xfs

On 07/31/2004 11:28 AM, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 09:58:15AM -0700, Net Llama! wrote:
> 
> 
>>Out of sheer curiosity, what kind of 'craptop' drive is this?
> 
> 
> HITACHI DK23EB-40 (it's failry new, only 1 yr or so old, so I'm no
> thrilled about IO errors at all but otherwise it seems to be working
> pertty well).  I'm wondering if it's worse than it might otherwise be
> because the machine is moved about very often and gets a very hard
> life.

Nah, that sounds like about the quality i've come to know & hate from 
Hitachi (AKA IBM) drives of late.  When I have a choice, i stick with 
Seagate.


-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
L. Friedman                       	       netllama@linux-sxs.org
Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: 		    http://netllama.ipfox.com

  11:30:00 up 40 days, 22:14,  2 users,  load average: 0.31, 0.23, 0.15