Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i763tuSc011339 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:55:56 -0700 Received: (from xfs@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.12.8/Submit) id i763tuV6011338 for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:55:56 -0700 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i763ttfC011324 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:55:55 -0700 Received: (from apache@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.12.8/Submit) id i763U39s011150; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:30:03 -0700 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 20:30:03 -0700 Message-Id: <200408060330.i763U39s011150@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-master@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 272] xfs_force_shutdown in xfs_trans_cancel, part 2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-archive-position: 3855 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 1366 Lines: 52 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272 ------- Additional Comments From sandeen@sgi.com 2004-05-08 20:30 PDT ------- here's the inode: xfs_db> dblock 2064, type inode, print: core.magic = 0x494e core.mode = 0 core.version = 1 core.format = 0 (dev) core.nlinkv1 = 0 core.uid = 0 core.gid = 0 core.flushiter = 0 core.atime.sec = Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 core.atime.nsec = 000000000 core.mtime.sec = Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 core.mtime.nsec = 000000000 core.ctime.sec = Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 core.ctime.nsec = 000000000 core.size = 0 core.nblocks = 0 core.extsize = 0 core.nextents = 0 core.naextents = 0 core.forkoff = 0 core.aformat = 0 (dev) core.dmevmask = 0 core.dmstate = 0 core.newrtbm = 0 core.prealloc = 0 core.realtime = 0 core.immutable = 0 core.append = 0 core.sync = 0 core.noatime = 0 core.nodump = 0 core.gen = 0 so this is a little odd; we returned EFSCORRUPTED from xfs_itobp because either the magic or the version was wrong, but on disk it looks fine. ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.