Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-xfs); Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0LJD3oT008431 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:13:03 -0800 Received: (from xfs@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.12.8/Submit) id j0LJD265008430 for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:13:02 -0800 Received: from oss.sgi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0LJD1xL008414 for ; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:13:01 -0800 Received: (from apache@localhost) by oss.sgi.com (8.13.0/8.12.8/Submit) id j0LIXGYo006916; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:33:16 -0800 Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:33:16 -0800 Message-Id: <200501211833.j0LIXGYo006916@oss.sgi.com> From: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com To: xfs-master@oss.sgi.com Subject: [Bug 290] XFS Kernel Memory Leak X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/650/Sun Jan 2 19:00:02 2005 clamav-milter version 0.80j on 127.0.0.1 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 4788 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: bugzilla-daemon@oss.sgi.com Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-xfs Content-Length: 953 Lines: 28 http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290 erek@necrotec.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |major Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | ------- Additional Comments From erek@necrotec.com 2005-21-01 10:33 PDT ------- i'm using Kernel 2.6.7 and 2.6.8.1.. and every night that updatedb would run.. i'd go from 450MB Free to 120MB Free and 568KB Swap Used.. (using the command free to view memory statistics).. i tried the perl script provided previously and witnessed the same memory usage.. and after ctrl-c'ing it the memory was never reclaimed... there is still a problem in my opinion... ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.