Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:41:07 +1000
From: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>, Ed <spied@yandex.ru>, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: why is log version=1 default?
Message-ID: <20050608164107.C1319708@boing.melbourne.sgi.com>
References: <42A0AE93.6010001@yandex.ru> <20050606151045.P1319708@boing.melbourne.sgi.com> <003874.f47b8d00f0d0e5163b2a498c9a81b182.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <003874.f47b8d00f0d0e5163b2a498c9a81b182.ANY@taniwha.stupidest.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:46:34PM -0700
Sender: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: linux-xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 583
Lines: 20

Hi Chris,

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 09:46:34PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:10:45PM +1000, Tim Shimmin wrote:
> 
> > The only problem would be if you wanted to mount the filesystem
> > using a linux kernel predating around June 2002 and/or mounting on
> > an IRIX kernel prior to 6.5.26.
> 
> Does IRIX 6.5.26 support v2 directories anyway?
> 
I'm a bit confused by the question - are you confusing v2 directories
with v2 logs perhaps?

v2 directories went in around IRIX 6.5.5mf and became
the default in 6.5.14mf.
v2 logs went into IRIX 6.5.26.

--Tim