Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:24:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-oss-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50 autolearn=ham version=3.2.0-pre1-r499012 Received: from smtp-ft4.fr.colt.net (smtp-ft4.fr.colt.net [213.41.78.208]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l2FENg6p002845 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:23:44 -0700 Received: from harpe.intellique.com (host.93.124.68.195.rev.coltfrance.com [195.68.124.93]) by smtp-ft4.fr.colt.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge3) with ESMTP id l2FE4O6U002621; Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:04:25 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 15:04:22 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac To: Thomas Walker Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Should xfs_repair take this long? Message-ID: <20070315150422.7bc5d178@harpe.intellique.com> In-Reply-To: <45F92D8C.3090708@stsci.edu> References: <45F92D8C.3090708@stsci.edu> Organization: Intellique X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by oss.sgi.com id l2FENk6p002853 X-archive-position: 10824 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: eflorac@intellique.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Content-Length: 485 Lines: 17 Le Thu, 15 Mar 2007 07:27:08 -0400 Thomas Walker écrivait: > xfs_repair -o assume_xfs /dev/mapper/vg0-hladata3 > > This command has been running for two days now. Is there any output from xfs_repair ? This doesn't sound good. I've run xfs_repair on some badly corrupted fs up to 13 TB, and it never took more than a couple of minutes. -- ---------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac | Intellique ----------------------------------------