Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:47:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.uni-bamberg.de (ldap.uni-bamberg.de [141.13.240.52]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l3QJl3fB000638 for ; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:47:05 -0700 Received: from [192.168.1.100] [217.229.50.12] by mail.uni-bamberg.de with ESMTP (SMTPD-8.22) id A1B501D4; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:47:01 +0200 From: Martin Eisenhardt Organization: =?iso-8859-1?q?Otto-Friedrich-Universit=E4t?= Bamberg To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Unexpected XFS SB number 0x00000000 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:46:55 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3543304.phMfCJkCqD"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200704262146.59921.martin.eisenhardt@wiai.uni-bamberg.de> X-archive-position: 11201 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: martin.eisenhardt@wiai.uni-bamberg.de Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs --nextPart3543304.phMfCJkCqD Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello list(s), I run XFS on a software raid on Linux 2.6.19. When I invoke xfs_db in=20 read-only mode, I get: # xfs_db -r /dev/md0 xfs_db: unexpected XFS SB magic number 0x00000000 xfs_db: read failed: Invalid argument xfs_db: data size check failed Segmentation fault The system is still running, the filesystem seems to be fine (except for th= e=20 above): files are created, written, and deleted without any problem. So, I have two questions: * Is there a real problem, or might a quick reboot solve this? * If there is a real problem with the file system: What steps do you recomm= end=20 to overcome this problem? * How safe is it to run xfs_check and xfs_repair? Thanks in advance! Kind regards Martin Eisenhardt P.S.: Sorry for cross-posting, I just figure that maybe the XFS users on=20 non-linux systems might have a hint or two for me ... ;-) --nextPart3543304.phMfCJkCqD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBGMQGzVUsW4y0BHEIRAgz0AJ9b1WM82QzdM+XJw24JVEppa/kMhQCeOM/7 nFHLi8PkV2WrBLZj1WedVP4= =HQDp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3543304.phMfCJkCqD--