Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lucidpixels.com (lucidpixels.com [75.144.35.66]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l52MR5Wt016783 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 15:27:06 -0700 Received: by lucidpixels.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8F780B000083; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:27:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lucidpixels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAB15000149; Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:27:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2007 18:27:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Justin Piszcz X-X-Sender: jpiszcz@p34.internal.lan To: Christian Kujau cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.22-rc3 safe to migrate to? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-archive-position: 11579 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs Jun 2 18:23:23 p34 upsd[2225]: Can't connect to UPS [belkin] (newhidups-auto): No such file or directory Jun 2 18:24:23 p34 upsmon[2228]: Poll UPS [belkin@localhost] failed - Driver not connected Hmm, something changes with USB in 2.6.22-rc3 form 2.6.21.. On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2007, Justin Piszcz wrote: >> Wondering as their were a lot of XFS related issues early on in >> development..? The 2.6.22-rc3 kernel has the core 2 duo coretemp patch by >> ruik which I want be running as long as 2.6.22-rc3 does not have any severe >> XFS issues? > > Tracking -rc and running 2.6.22-rc3 for a couple of days now, no problems > with xfs since this infamous 2.6.17 thingy[0]. But that's pretty useless > information I guess, since your setup will be different from mine. Did you > have anything "special" in mind when asking this? > > C. > > [0] http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#dir2 > -- > BOFH excuse #339: > > manager in the cable duct > >