Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:38:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l929cQmg029694 for ; Tue, 2 Oct 2007 02:38:31 -0700 Received: from hch by pentafluge.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1IceCs-0006UE-Fa; Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:38:22 +0100 Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 10:38:22 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: David Chinner Cc: Andi Kleen , Timothy Shimmin , Martin Steigerwald , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Creation time in XFS Message-ID: <20071002093822.GA24907@infradead.org> References: <200709302124.38164.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <470042DC.2040009@sgi.com> <20071002092509.GF995458@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071002092509.GF995458@sgi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4452/Mon Oct 1 22:03:17 2007 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-archive-position: 13219 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com X-original-sender: hch@infradead.org Precedence: bulk X-list: xfs On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 07:25:10PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > > I don't think it is at all currently: > > So what is the point? Forensic analysis? Windows wants it, so I guess they added when they had to bump the inode version anyway in preparation of a user interface for samba. We probably should do the same for XFS when bumping the inode version for the crcs.