X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from relay.sgi.com (netops-testserver-3.corp.sgi.com [192.26.57.72]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9RMMISM012335 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:22:18 -0700 Received: from estes.americas.sgi.com (estes.americas.sgi.com [128.162.236.10]) by netops-testserver-3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50D2908A8 for ; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [134.15.64.119] (cf-vpn-sw-corp-64-119.corp.sgi.com [134.15.64.119]) by estes.americas.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E6B70001D5; Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:22:14 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <49063F75.7000604@sgi.com> Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:23:49 -0500 From: Bill Kendall User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080502) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mlueck@lueckdatasystems.com Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.91.2, clamav-milter version 0.91.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Michael Lueck wrote: > No suggestions / possible answers anyone for my question... > > Michael Lueck wrote: >> Greetings- >> >> I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: >> http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ >> >> I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great >> success. Today, xfsrestore really threw me a curve ball. I am >> wondering what went wrong. >> >> I had wanted to restore from an old backup some directories that I >> discovered I had need of. I used the following syntax to get the >> restore started: >> >> xfsrestore -J -E -f /mnt/ext_backup/ldslnx01/20061220/data -s >> shares/data -i -v verbose /srv >> >> I selected some directories to restore through the interactive >> interface, then allowed it to restore the specified files. >> >> What it ended up doing, HOWEVER, was to restore every file present in >> that old backup that was no longer on disk! >> >> Thus, what went wrong? >> >> Thanks! > Hi Michael, I tried to reproduce this using the command line you supplied, but everything worked as expected for me. Perhaps try it without the -i (so that only subtrees given with -s are restored), just to rule out the possibility that you inadvertently added all files to the restore list. Bill