X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-r574664 (2007-09-11) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-r574664 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m9J1INEa004878 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:18:24 -0700 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1224379204-33fb02b60000-w1Z2WR X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from ciao.gmane.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 295E81430574 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id U36f3DNqyMyWRIEP for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2008 18:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KrMxe-0002Mm-DX for linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:20:02 +0000 Received: from 75-134-105-39.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com ([75.134.105.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:20:02 +0000 Received: from mlueck by 75-134-105-39.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 19 Oct 2008 01:20:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com From: Michael Lueck X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? Subject: Bad day with xfsrestore, what went wrong? Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 21:13:36 -0400 Organization: Lueck Data Systems Lines: 23 Message-ID: Reply-To: mlueck@lueckdatasystems.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 75-134-105-39.dhcp.aldl.mi.charter.com User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080707) Sender: news X-Barracuda-Connect: main.gmane.org[80.91.229.2] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1224379206 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0091 1.0000 -1.9614 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.96 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.96 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.8248 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Greetings- I hope this is the NNTP equiv of the email list found on this web page: http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/ I have been using XFS with Debian for a number of years with great success. Today, xfsrestore really threw me a curve ball. I am wondering what went wrong. I had wanted to restore from an old backup some directories that I discovered I had need of. I used the following syntax to get the restore started: xfsrestore -J -E -f /mnt/ext_backup/ldslnx01/20061220/data -s shares/data -i -v verbose /srv I selected some directories to restore through the interactive interface, then allowed it to restore the specified files. What it ended up doing, HOWEVER, was to restore every file present in that old backup that was no longer on disk! Thus, what went wrong? Thanks! -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/