Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id mB7JQDac030395 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:26:14 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1228677962-731600080000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail.harddata.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3CF5AEFE068 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.harddata.com ([207.148.148.78]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id beHIAOzq3yVHlrTM for ; Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.60.190] (gate.harddata.com [207.148.148.89]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.harddata.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id mB7IZCbD025213 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 7 Dec 2008 11:35:15 -0700 Message-ID: <493C1765.7070901@harddata.com> Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 11:35:17 -0700 From: Maurice Hilarius Organization: Hard Data Ltd. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans-Peter Jansen CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Justin Piszcz , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions Subject: Re: 3ware 9650SE-16ML w/XFS & RAID6: first impressions References: <200812071355.49427.hpj@urpla.net> In-Reply-To: <200812071355.49427.hpj@urpla.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on mail.harddata.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[207.148.148.78] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1228677971 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.92 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, RDNS_NONE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.12186 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.10 RDNS_NONE Delivered to trusted network by a host with no rDNS Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-length: 1533 Hans-Peter Jansen wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2008 schrieb Justin Piszcz: > >> For read speed, it appears that there is some overhead (2x). With >> software raid6 I used to get 1.0Gbyte/sec read speed, or at least >> 800MiB/s across the entire array, now I only get 538MiB/s across the >> entire array. However, write speed is improved. Before it was in the mid >> 400s for RAID6 and peaking at 502MiB/s at the outer edge of the drives. >> For the write speed now, its around 620-640MiB/s at the end of the array >> and 580-620MiB/s going in further and 502MiB/s across the entire array. I >> always heard all of the horror stories with 3ware cards, it turns out >> they're not so bad after all. >> > > Hustin, if you're after speed, AND sane support, you may consider trying > Areca products. I'm biased, since 3ware fed me up completely, when it came > to a single drive failure in a RAID 5 setup: the support only provides an > ugly web interface: when posting my problem, they replied with: > > Nice Areca advertisement. Of course you can demonstrate how their tech support responded, to a similar DISK failure, with a better suggestion, and more promptly? Buried for biased and irrelevant. -- With our best regards, //Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-780-456-9771/ /Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-780-456-9772/ /11060 - 166 Avenue email:maurice@harddata.com/ /Edmonton, AB, Canada http://www.harddata.com// / T5X 1Y3/ / [[HTML alternate version deleted]]