X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_34 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id n09LgBhL025592 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:42:12 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1231537330-62e801e00000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from zaphod.dth.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 62A0A17C94DB for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:42:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from zaphod.dth.net (zaphod.dth.net [85.159.112.68]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Zy9PR873ydD1BwLE for ; Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:42:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zaphod.dth.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25E5AE37AC; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:42:09 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/8848/Fri Jan 9 07:16:38 2009 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at dth.net Received: from zaphod.dth.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zaphod.dth.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXXVZTI4p5mp; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:42:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by zaphod.dth.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 034F3AE37AE; Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:42:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:42:06 +0100 From: Danny ter Haar To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2 Subject: Re: problems showing up as XFS problems on kernels after 2.6.28-git2 Message-ID: <20090109214206.GA2901@dth.net> References: <20090107184420.GA15653@dth.net> <20090107185628.GA19255@infradead.org> <20090108215602.GA24479@dth.net> <20090109004609.GM9448@disturbed> <20090109012610.GA23075@dth.net> <20090109020800.GO9448@disturbed> <20090109061043.GA31450@dth.net> <20090109194445.GA28759@infradead.org> <20090109195144.GA19857@dth.net> <20090109195852.GA6362@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090109195852.GA6362@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Barracuda-Connect: zaphod.dth.net[85.159.112.68] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1231537331 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.1.14808 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Status: Clean Quoting Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org): > There is no specific 2.6.28-git respository, just a main linux 2.6 one: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git > The git bisect command make sure you will get the right revisions > checked out to bisect. still not making myself clear i guess.. lenny32:/usr/src/linux-2.6# git tag|grep 2.6.28 v2.6.28 v2.6.28-rc1 v2.6.28-rc2 v2.6.28-rc3 v2.6.28-rc4 v2.6.28-rc5 v2.6.28-rc6 v2.6.28-rc7 v2.6.28-rc8 v2.6.28-rc9 So i cannot use any "standard" GIT command to also include linus's git tree ?! that seems odd. He committed them somehow in git didn't he ? I could of course compile /patch 2 kernel trees by hand in fact i allready have: lenny32:/usr/src# ls -l total 16 drwxr-sr-x 2 root src 146 2009-01-09 08:29 archive drwxr-sr-x 2 root src 4096 2009-01-08 11:33 configs drwxr-sr-x 23 root src 4096 2009-01-08 19:56 linux-2.6 drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 2009-01-08 11:53 linux-2.6.28-git2-d drwxr-xr-x 24 root root 4096 2009-01-08 10:21 linux-2.6.28-git3-d But i'm not familiar how to instruct git to find the differences between the 2 source tree's and how to use git to find out was the culprit is. Any other suggestions ? --