X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6J0j1w6183119 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:45:02 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1247964816-67ae02c20000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from Ishtar.tlinx.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id DC7B2A93965 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Ishtar.tlinx.org (ishtar.tlinx.org [64.81.245.74]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id zsj0AQPBw7ztlGZB for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.3.11] (Athena [192.168.3.11]) by Ishtar.tlinx.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id n6J0jd8C010756 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:45:41 -0700 Message-ID: <4A626CB3.8050500@tlinx.org> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 17:45:39 -0700 From: "Linda A. Walsh" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xfs-oss X-ASG-Orig-Subj: logbuf= Subject: logbuf= X-Stationery: 0.4.9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: ishtar.tlinx.org[64.81.245.74] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1247964816 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0392 1.0000 -1.7684 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -1.77 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-1.77 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.3772 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean What's the current default these days for logbufs on mounted disks? Is it up to 8? Would there be any benefit in increasing it beyond 8? Just that memory isn't quite so tight these days as it used to be and thought the default probably should at least be 8 these days -- and wondering if increasing the max would be of any benefit...