X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0-rupdated (updated) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FH_DATE_PAST_20XX autolearn=no version=3.3.0-rupdated Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o3QNNpkW113911 for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:23:51 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1272324350-091703190000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 6CE6412683BA for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice2.aconex.com (mail.aconex.com [203.89.202.182]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id RpPg5FR7evYtdl8l for ; Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com (Spam & Virus Firewall) with ESMTP id C977E4D6B22; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from postoffice.aconex.com (postoffice.yarra.acx [192.168.102.1]) by postoffice2.aconex.com with ESMTP id 6BX5zZtq1vAaKH84; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com (gatekeeper.yarra.acx [192.168.102.10]) by postoffice.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84693A50110; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:22:40 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9DF48862F; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:48 +1000 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at aconex.com Received: from gatekeeper.aconex.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gatekeeper.aconex.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QZxVTRrXQRn5; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:44 +1000 (EST) Received: from mail-au.aconex.com (mail-au.aconex.com [192.168.102.12]) by gatekeeper.aconex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FBD488622; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:44 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:25:43 +1000 (EST) From: Nathan Scott To: Ray Van Dolson Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <537687191.239471272324343715.JavaMail.root@mail-au.aconex.com> In-Reply-To: <20100426225627.GA7106@esri.com> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: O_SYNC behavior? Subject: Re: O_SYNC behavior? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [203.89.192.141] X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.18_GA_3011.RHEL5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/5.0.18_GA_3011.RHEL5_64) X-Barracuda-Connect: mail.aconex.com[203.89.202.182] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1272324351 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.28440 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Status: Clean ----- "Ray Van Dolson" wrote: > End-user question: > > NFS client accessing an NFS export on an XFS based filesystem via > "sync" (O_SYNC) mode. > > Will write confirmation be sent back from the NFS server when the > data is written to the xfs journal, Data is never written to the journal. cheers. -- Nathan