X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with SMTP id p2T8vpDJ218746 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 03:57:52 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1301389261-217101510000-NocioJ X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-bin/mark.cgi Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 3BB23387C2F for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com (mail-qw0-f53.google.com [209.85.216.53]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XWAsFKSiEYYDzJEg for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qwb7 with SMTP id 7so2393257qwb.26 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=W2UtgubePfIxQwVbcYflLMc48uCN7NSUBHhbKVwqGdA=; b=MCVWwvB5CQnZVXYdQULw+G+ovMtgOcJ+J1F1r3Dqe2tV03MSjqnbR2eHYc5ebzzYg+ o+pM/mOOqVRZCmGiGaitG2XeA//SpN0fBF0GaTeSWIbuZmDPQzG7KQW2BFpXw1rkSvN4 /mAh7LLY0PN4Pb6ob/HMgZYMr2EDdXZVOpvGA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=dN+4BgEE42YRy5mH+61WWsQP3RFb2YMWFJq725wvQ7/lyVWOt4YOn7pQrXHN7QgdTu AU52GO/ruV+e0BIxJlL4dGRoK1hht9k2QaINNIAwiw+6Ay1IF+yXcebVldNX4m5IeqvG QB/o1ob1l1JFIeO+iEbUXRR3Be8jLRoNCII1o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.113.142 with SMTP id a14mr1231076qaq.269.1301389261299; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.78.160 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2011 02:01:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4D8A1594.5060505@redhat.com> References: <4D8A0A70.9030201@redhat.com> <4D8A1594.5060505@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:01:01 +0200 Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 Subject: Re: xfstests: failure to umount ext4 From: Amir Goldstein To: Eric Sandeen Cc: XFS , Ext4 Developers List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: mail-qw0-f53.google.com[209.85.216.53] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1301389262 X-Barracuda-Bayes: INNOCENT GLOBAL 0.0000 1.0000 -2.0210 X-Barracuda-Virus-Scanned: by cuda.sgi.com at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: -2.02 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=-2.02 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.59295 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.00 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature passes verification 0.00 DKIM_SIGNED Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a signature X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Status: Clean On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/23/11 10:33 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote= : >>> On 3/23/11 9:36 AM, Amir Goldstein wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Amir Goldstein w= rote: >>>>> >>>>> I've been running xfstests on ext4 and I always get annoying failures= to umount: >>>>> >>>>> 213 8s ... 31s >>>>> umount: /mnt/test/ext4: device is busy. >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0(In some cases useful info about processes that use >>>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the device is found by lsof(8) or fuser(1)) >>>>> >>>>> post 198 mostly fails to umount as well. >>>>> and post 124 always fails to umount. USE_REMOUNT=3D1 fixes (bypasses) the problem for non scratch tests, so I'm good with it for now :-) Amir.