X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q0DKDecf158361 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:13:41 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1326485615-00a9eb65e4274490001-NocioJ Received: from smtp3-g21.free.fr (smtp3-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DEQQW550cSKEnHzg for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:13:36 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: eflorac@intellique.com X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 212.27.42.3 Received: from galadriel.home (unknown [82.235.234.79]) by smtp3-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D565A6469; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:13:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 21:13:11 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac To: pg_xf2@xf2.for.sabi.co.UK (Peter Grandi) Cc: Linux fs XFS Subject: Re: xfs version and kernels Message-ID: <20120113211311.7b72e7c0@galadriel.home> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: xfs version and kernels In-Reply-To: <20240.31117.130540.618190@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> References: <20120113174739.26ae0c07@harpe.intellique.com> <20240.31117.130540.618190@tree.ty.sabi.co.UK> Organization: Intellique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp3-g21.free.fr[212.27.42.3] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1326485615 X-Barracuda-URL: http://cuda.sgi.com:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on oss.sgi.com X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=2.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=2.1 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.85839 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-Virus-Status: Clean Le Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:35:57 +0000 vous =C3=A9criviez: > That's interesting: the RedHat backports of newer XFS features > were only done for the 64b build. However the reply is dated > 2006, and a 2.6.18-128 kernel may well be more ancient than > that, and since it is from 5.3, it is so old it does not have > the backports in the 64b version either as that was done in 5.4. This was an x64 RedHat, anyway. Needed to be, because the filesystem is 76 TB :) --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique | Intellique | | +33 1 78 94 84 02 ------------------------------------------------------------------------