X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q1ADIcwk251721 for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:18:39 -0600 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1328879916-04bdf075178fa0d0001-NocioJ Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id wHLUZCqH50i6xo8A (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:18:37 -0800 (PST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: shane.dempsey@emc.com X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 128.222.32.20 X-Barracuda-IPDD: Level2 [emc.com/128.222.32.20] Received: from hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI01.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.54]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q1ADIO3j003738 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:18:35 -0500 X-Barracuda-IPDD: Level2 [emc.com/128.222.32.20] X-Barracuda-IPDD: Level2 [emc.com/128.222.32.20] X-Barracuda-IPDD: Level2 [emc.com/128.222.32.20] X-Barracuda-IPDD: Level2 [emc.com/128.222.32.20] Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.222.130]) by hop04-l1d11-si01.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:27 -0500 Received: from mxhub23.corp.emc.com (mxhub23.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.135]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q1ADHRh4022691; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:27 -0500 Received: from mx27a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.225]) by mxhub23.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.135]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:26 -0500 From: To: CC: Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:24 -0500 Subject: RE: Red Hat bug 643571 Thread-Topic: Red Hat bug 643571 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: RE: Red Hat bug 643571 Thread-Index: AcznWob/cyvBY0wVQ92H1WZQs8YuWAAm7iGw Message-ID: References: <4F341365.3010400@sandeen.net> In-Reply-To: <4F341365.3010400@sandeen.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EMM-MHVC: 1 X-Barracuda-Connect: mexforward.lss.emc.com[128.222.32.20] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1328879916 X-Barracuda-Encrypted: AES256-SHA X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.48.157.11:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com Hi Eric, Thanks a lot for your reply. Regards, Shane. -----Original Message----- From: Eric Sandeen [mailto:sandeen@sandeen.net]=20 Sent: 09 February 2012 18:42 To: Dempsey, Shane Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Red Hat bug 643571 On 2/9/12 10:45 AM, shane.dempsey@emc.com wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I believe Eric Sandee was working on this bug - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3D643571 to resolve a > fragmentation issue with XFS on RHEL 5.5. >=20 > Do you know if this fix is in RHEL 6.1, kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15? RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW. But from the comments in the bug: linux-2.6-fs-xfs-fix-speculative-allocation-beyond-eof.patch is what went in; [sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git log --pretty=3Doneline fs/xfs | grep "spec= ulative allocation" 9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880 [XFS] Fix speculative allocation b= eyond eof [sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git describe --contains 9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b49= 3be5637cc5b5659880 v2.6.30-rc8~5^2~56 so it went into 2.6.30, so should be present in all later kernels. -Eric Sandeen-with-an-N ;) >=20 >=20 >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 >=20 > Shane. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list=20 > xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs