X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_27, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q3C7vmW9128876 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 02:57:49 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1334217466-04cbb05c38b6f9e0001-NocioJ Received: from smtp.pobox.com (b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com [208.72.237.35]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id UQdjk23lSifUr4xK for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:57:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: b.candler@pobox.com X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 208.72.237.35 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37C866CC; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:57:45 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; s=sasl; bh=12rkCEZ73LW2fxMPt1hZFWyl1Nw=; b=f48i12P 0wNtUM4Mk3XrhvkbHRnyZzRH70p9jjSFvyriOvaoq0/tK1VWLENMKYDGIinfNj1w QvkuUpq4fdMIQ7go19AN1J+kT38l5xqbgSTODKpESmKB24tSx79vQUdDNgsv+Dv/ ToM7GVGBTpVOrBsIoDfY1cxD/HypizbYnoMQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :in-reply-to; q=dns; s=sasl; b=eElj70D2U+UKGHdm8bUFy78MLHM+KcUrk 6GH2KKIx4HeaiM8c3+M0+oYKe2o9GN1ZQyWXnKuI7WqETj3YXlmLt+qr1qG+0rT+ ugB8ii9+APvNP7/z24XevjgR/O0XYtgrP/pnNATLsAWsx/SShLiUcDGtLwl41e+J O1asTTdwck= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C903B66CB; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from Brians-MacBook-Air.local (unknown [87.112.177.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4724066C6; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 03:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brian by Brians-MacBook-Air.local with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id M2CWSB-000NUQ-0E; Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:57:47 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 08:57:47 +0100 From: Brian Candler To: David Fuller Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: Fragmentation Issue We Are Having Message-ID: <20120412075747.GB30891@nsrc.org> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: Fragmentation Issue We Are Having References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 303B8C26-8475-11E1-B036-9DB42E706CDE-28021239!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-Barracuda-Connect: b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com[208.72.237.35] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1334217467 X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.48.176.25:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.10 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.10 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1.3 tests=BSF_SC0_SA085, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.93886 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.00 DKIM_VERIFIED Domain Keys Identified Mail: signature passes verification 0.00 DKIM_SIGNED Domain Keys Identified Mail: message has a signature 0.10 BSF_SC0_SA085 Custom Rule SA085 On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 06:04:25PM -0700, David Fuller wrote: > Adn here are the mount options on one of our servers: > > xfs rw,noikeep,allocsize=256M,logbufs=8,sunit=128,swidth=2304 What's the total file system size? If it's over 1TB then you almost certainly should have 'inode64' as well. http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_is_the_inode64_mount_option_for.3F