X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-r929098 (2010-03-30) on oss.sgi.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.4.0-r929098 Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id q5LA6skK034328 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:06:54 -0500 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1340273212-04cb6c3b90924340001-NocioJ Received: from greer.hardwarefreak.com (mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net [65.41.216.221]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id jWPtFDgDSWfGZ5ky for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 03:06:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: stan@hardwarefreak.com X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 65.41.216.221 Received: from [192.168.100.53] (gffx.hardwarefreak.com [192.168.100.53]) by greer.hardwarefreak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981066C080; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:06:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <4FE2F23D.90303@hardwarefreak.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 05:06:53 -0500 From: Stan Hoeppner Reply-To: stan@hardwarefreak.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Dave Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [regression] stack overflow in xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks References: <20120621091803.GB10673@dastard> <20120621092104.GA3621@infradead.org> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [regression] stack overflow in xfs_buf_iodone_callbacks In-Reply-To: <20120621092104.GA3621@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Barracuda-Connect: mo-65-41-216-221.sta.embarqhsd.net[65.41.216.221] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1340273213 X-Barracuda-URL: http://192.48.176.15:80/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at sgi.com X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.10 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.10 using per-user scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1.3 tests=RDNS_DYNAMIC X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.100484 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.10 RDNS_DYNAMIC Delivered to trusted network by host with dynamic-looking rDNS On 6/21/2012 4:21 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 07:18:03PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: >> I don't have time to come up with a fix for this right now, but it >> needs to be fixed before 3.5 releases. I don't have time because I'm >> going to be AFK next week, so I'd appreciate it if someone could >> look at fixing this in the mean time? > > I'll handle it. Reading this exchange, seeing the teamwork, is really cool, and struck a chord with me for some reason. Especially considering that "I'll handle it" is probably a many hour (or day) commitment, made with 3 simple words, at the drop of a hat. Being part of a list where both deep technical development and 'simple' end user issues are both handled, in a team fashion, is even cooler. We probably don't say it enough, so I'll do so now. Thank you guys, all the XFS developers, for the work you do that benefits us all. And thanks to all my fellow XFS users, for helping make this list what I think is a great community, and an example for other lists to follow. -- Stan