[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks

To: Xuan Baldauf <xuan--reiserfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: benchmarks
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 05:21:16 +1200
Cc: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>, Federico Sevilla III <jijo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, reiserfs-list@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>
References: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10107141752080.18419-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl> <3B507259.4436853E@baldauf.org>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 06:24:57PM +0200, Xuan Baldauf wrote:

    I hope that someday, there will be an emancipation from NFS away
    (or an NFS without those problems).  Maybe Samba|CIFS can be a
    replacement someday. CIFS has some overhead, too, due to it's
    windows origins, but this is per packed basis and not for an
    unlimited time into the future.

read the first chapter of tridges' Samba book about NFS and CIFS
before saying things like that :)

NFS is far from perfect, CIFS isn't a solution though.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>