xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Logdev size?

To: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Logdev size?
From: Nathan Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 10:14:30 -0500
In-reply-to: <20010724093658.B706@sgi.com>
Mail-followup-to: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
References: <200107241402.f6OE2qD24056@jen.americas.sgi.com> <20010724102533.F31186@dkp.com> <20010724093658.B706@sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 09:36:58AM -0500, Nathan Straz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:25:33AM -0400, Andrew Klaassen wrote:
> > That makes me nervous; there isn't a tagged-and-tested CVS
> > kernel, is there?
> 
> Nope, especially not on a 1TB IDE RAID5.  

I'm going to work on running patch-2.4.7-xfs-2001-07-22 through some
regression tests and if I have time today I'll try to get the top of the
CVS tree built and tested too.  I'll put out a quick report before I
leave for OLS.  

-- 
Nate Straz                                              nstraz@xxxxxxx
sgi, inc                                           http://www.sgi.com/
Linux Test Project                                  http://ltp.sf.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>