xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: spam

Subject: Re: spam
From: "D. Stimits" <stimits@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 16:55:39 -0600
Cc: "XFS: linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107090913340.326-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org> <3B48DEB5.CAE7BE98@idcomm.com> <3B48E0F9.4F566FFA@berdmann.de>
Reply-to: stimits@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Bernhard R. Erdmann" wrote:
> 
> > Looking closer, I see that it was a "TO" address of Japan. More
> > confusing is:
> > Sender:
> >     owner-linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Does that mean there was an attempt to forge the header? Or maybe sgi is
> > being used as a relay? I see now the actual sender (and the ISP is about
> > to get an email):
> > "West Quinn" <ptm31p@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The From: line is forged, too.
> 
> Look at the Received: lines:
> 
> Received: from mail.sidac.co.jp (dns.sidac.co.jp [211.6.163.50])
>         by oss.sgi.com (8.11.2/8.11.3) with SMTP id f68KIuV15580
>         for <linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 13:18:56 -0700
> Received: from host (06-073.081.popsite.net [64.24.246.73])
>         by mail.sidac.co.jp (8.9.3/3.7Wpl2) with ESMTP id EAA06944;
>         Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:37:02 +0900
> 
> This spam originated from 06-073.081.popsite.net and was relayed through
> dns.sidac.co.jp to oss.sgi.com.
> I already sent a complaint to abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxx

You probably can't hear it, but I am cheering now.

D. Stimits, stimits@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>